Jas Elmer
Professor Dylan Craig
SIS 105-001H
September 11, 2011
There
is a reason why China has not surpassed the United States and became the next
super power, the reason being they do not have any soft power. Without soft
power it is difficult for countries to establish relations with those in their
region and other states worldwide with which they trade or have diplomatic relations.
The United States has a great deal of soft power. Many people speak with
Americans or watch Hollywood movies. This increases our soft power because
viewers desire what they see in American films: the different rights,
privileges and advantages which we have. On the other hand, it can be argued
that China has very weak soft power.
China’s lack of soft power is
highlighted by the weakening relations between China and its neighbors. As
China has gained power many other Asian countries, including Japan and Korea,
have become closer to the United States and more distant from China. Recently, China
has realized its need for soft power and has been investing billions in an
attempt to improve their public image. However, due to governmental
restrictions and previous reputations it has proved difficult for China to
drastically change the view which others have upon them. Another indicator of
their lack of soft power is their standard of living.
GDP is a huge identifier in
economic power. Nye acknowledged that China is going to have the biggest GDP
and therefore the biggest economy. However, with a population of 1.3 billion he
also pointed out that their GDP per capita is quite low, especially compared to
other economic super powers. Having a lower GDP per capita means that the
standard of living in China is not as high, making it difficult for China to
become the next super power.
One could come to the conclusion
that in order to become the next super power a state would simply need to hold
more economic and military power than other states and gaining soft power,
although it would make diplomatic relations easier, would be irrelevant.
Without the need for soft power it would make it possible for China to become
the next super power. However, by applying Joseph Nye’s theory to this case it
becomes apparent that soft power is crucial in becoming a world power.
According to Nye there are three
types of power: aggressive militaristic power, giving rewards to people or
states when they demonstrate desirable behaviors and soft power. Soft power is
persuading others to want the same things you want. In Nye’s opinion this is
the most desirable kind of power, this is because having soft power saves a
state’s money because they do not need to budget for military attacks or rewards.
Also having soft power is not as invasive, states do not feel like they are
being controlled as they do with the two other types of power which leads to
better relations in between states.
Relationships
are becoming increasingly important as the world becomes more globalized and
more states are becoming rising economic and political powers. Many of these
rising powers are eastern states. Therefore as more states such as China, India
and Brazil emerge the idea of western power is slowly dissolving. Additionally
as more states emerge as powers, diplomatic relations and soft power become
more important because it is harder for one state to control others by military
means. This means that in order for a country to become a power they need to
have a firm grasp on soft power not only among western states but all over the
world.
China’s
strained relations among countries is one of the major reasons they will have
trouble becoming the next super power. Without being able to form strong
relations with local countries it will be difficult for China to form worldwide
relations. This will be especially difficult if those countries which are not
on good terms with China form alliances with the United States, thus making the
United States stronger and China weaker. Also without having a higher standard
of living states will be weary to support their endeavors and will not try to
mimic China’s domestic policy because they will not want to have a similar
standard of living.
Nye’s presentation was valuable
because it gave a chance for people, especially new students, to gain exposure
to international relations concepts and vocabulary. He also went into depth
about current changes in the distribution of power and his idea of soft power.
Additionally, his presentation provided an international relations specialist’s
opinion on the issue between China and the United States, offering an educated
viewpoint which can be difficult to identify in our media. Nye’s presentation was beneficial for students
and encouraged them to continue or begin thinking in terms of international
relations.
Your explanation of soft power was very informative. I had never encountered the term before. With that said, I think it accurately describes the power dynamic between the US and China. Though China is rising to be on par and surpass the US economically, America still wields enormous influence culturally. However, I would not discount China's ability to rise to soft power giant status. America only did so after the world wars. An unforeseen catalyst may propel China in the same was as the US previously.
ReplyDeleteI definitely think China has the ability to gain soft power and could in time surpass the United States. However, I do not think they will be able to surpass the US soon because their current government system makes it difficult to culturally influence others and there are many countries who do not fully trust the Chinese government right now due to their lack of transparency. This being said I completely agree with you. It is hard to predict how China's influence over others could change in the future and it is definitely possible that an upcoming event could increase their soft power.
ReplyDeleteI also head Nye speak, and I think you did a vey good job explaining his points. As I was reading your explanation of soft power I started thinking about its affect on reciprocity and identity. Do you think a lack of soft power hurts China's ability to gain support through international organizations? Does lacking soft power hinder the possibility of China appealing to the good nature of a people's identity when its own identity is scrutinized?
ReplyDeleteI think that China's lack of soft power hurts them in some regards more than others. I do not think lack of soft power will hurt them economically. However, in many international organizations I think it will. Many international organizations are based, in full or in part, on humanitarian efforts. I think due to their reputation for lacking human rights, and without the transparency to see whether they are making improvements, it will lessen their credibility in this field. In regards to your second question I'm not sure I quite understand what you are trying to ask. What do you mean by the good nature of a people's identity?
ReplyDelete