Monday, November 14, 2011

Cities in developing countries and why urban planning doesn't really work

Cities in developing countries need planning. We can all picture the classic metropolis in a poor country – miles of shantytowns next to high rises, swanky commercial zones blocks from apartments full of squatters. The rich areas look fully developed, while the poor areas might as well be from a century ago. In comparison, cities in developed countries have rich and poor areas but they all have the same primary infrastructure (Balbo 24). As John C. Turner points out, “Rapid urbanization is essential to modernize political and economic structures and to raise productivity to the levels necessary for the support of the explosively growing populations” (354). Better infrastructure allows for more efficient economic growth, which in turn leads to a higher standard of living.

Unfortunately, we can’t rely on Western urban planning methods to develop cities in industrializing countries. We cannot really compare the urbanization of developing countries to the urbanization of developed countries for several reasons. The scale of change and rapidity of urbanization is almost unprecedented. Urbanization is now occurring in countries with relatively low levels of per capita income, and sometimes these cities are linked far more to the global economy than the domestic one (Cohen 27). For these reasons, as well as the different physical setup of metropolises in developing countries, traditional Western urban planning doesn’t work well in developing countries.

Traditional master planning is both too slow and too expensive for these rapidly urbanizing yet poor cities (Balbo 23). Just creating a new master plan can take several years, and implementing it takes far longer. With the rapid rate of urbanization and growth of cities in developing countries, the master plan may be obsolete by the time it is finished. Master plans are also very expensive, and cities lacking both strong institutions and pre-existing infrastructure may not have the resources to implement a master plan, particularly one that creates an entirely new infrastructure in some parts of the city.

To compound this problem, cities in developing countries often lack the strong governmental institutions that allow cities to develop and implement plans. McGill suggests that “urban management in developing countries is concerned with both city building (with its insatiable need for infrastructure) and institution building (with its seemingly endless need for increased capacity to perform)” (466). Unfortunately, infrastructure building is nigh impossible without institutions able fund and oversee the project.

Furthermore, cities in developing countries are fundamentally different from cities in developed countries. Many of them were created as a result of colonialism and thus have a bifurcated nature (Balbo 24). Even in cities built post-colonialism, there tends to be a much more striking gap between the rich and poor areas than in cities in developed countries because of the lack of an infrastructure base.

Some of the problem of maintaining infrastructure can be overcome by building efficiently and sustainably. Reducing urban sprawl is the classic example of sustainable cities. Given the huge population in these metropolises and the lack of planning, combined with lots of undeveloped land surrounding those cities, any significant increase in average standard of living will probably lead to the urban sprawl that plagues many American cities. Indeed, we can see some of this in the shantytowns in many major metropolises. While people in these areas live in do small spaces, the overall effects are one-level sprawl and poor, unsafe and unhealthy building materials. Efficient development is more sustainable than unplanned development.

In developing countries, we see giant metropolises surrounded by poverty stricken rural areas, creating disconnected environments. Physically as well as economically, a huge rural versus urban gap exists. However, connections between the two are growing, and small cities and towns are likely to see a large population expansion in the next few decades (Cohen 23). Cohen gives the example of desakota zones, from the Indonesian words for village and town or city. These are zones around cities that appear rural but derive most of their income from non-agricultural sources, such as remittances or cottage industries. With the creation of a middle class in developing countries, suburbs will most likely appear for those unable to afford living in the city center but unwilling to live in the poor sector. Developing efficient infrastructure in the current rural areas is also important to, again, reduce urban sprawl and create more efficient, sustainable cities. Moreover, a national network of infrastructure such as reliable roads can help spread the national wealth out from the capital city.

So how do we plan cities in developing countries? Some have suggested fully decentralizing and privatizing city planning (Rondinelli), but this solution calls on a strong planning sector of the economy, which is unlikely to exist in many developing countries. A better solution would be for developed countries to concentrate foreign aid on building infrastructure in developing cities. Foreign aid which increases standards of living without improving the infrastructure is ultimately unsustainable. Obviously, without money to maintain existing infrastructure no infrastructure is fully sustainable. However, putting infrastructure in place will help increase standards of living and thus improve the overall economy.

Balbo, Marcello. “Urban planning and the fragmented city of developing countries.” Third World Planning Review: 15.1 (1993) : 27- Web. 10 Nov 2011. <http://www.scribd.com/doc/48699717/Urban-planning-and-the-fragmented-city-of-developing-countries-by-Marcello-Balbo>

Cohen, Barney. “Urban Growth in Developing Countries: A Review of Current Trends and a Caution Regarding Existing Forecasts.” World Development: 32.1 (2004) : 23-51. Science Direct. Web. 9 Nov 2011. <http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305750X03001967>

Durand- Lasserve, Alain and Lauren Royston. Holding their ground: secure land tenure for urban poor in developing countries. London: Earthscan Publications, 2002. Web. 11 Nov 2011. <http://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=DcrLxppydcQC&oi=fnd&pg=PR3&dq=international+urban+development+in+developing+countries&ots=HGetsuWyVv&sig=2B_aQ3JJW4jhPXfVQRJrD9pRQvE#v=onepage&q=international%20urban%20development%20in%20developing%20countries&f=false>

McGill, Ronald. “Urban management in developing countries.” Cities: 15.6 (1998) : n. pag. Science Direct. Web. 10 Nov 2011. <http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264275198000419>

Rondinelli, Dennis A., James S. McCullough, and Ronald W. Johnson. “Analysing Decentralization Policies in Developing Countries: A Political-Economy Framework.” Development and Change: 20.1 (2008) : 57-87. Wiley Online Library. Web. 10 Nov 2011. <http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1467-7660.1989.tb00340.x/pdf>

Turner, John C. “Housing Priorities, Settlement Patterns, and Urban Development in Modernizing Countries.” Journal of the American Institute of Planners: 34.6 (1968) : 354-363. Web. Taylor and Francis Online. 9 Nov 2011. <http://www.tandfonline.com.proxyau.wrlc.org/doi/pdf/10.1080/01944366808977562>

7 comments:

  1. How would you respond to Bratman's Development's Paradox, which argues that even cities,such as Washington, DC, in first world countries have many, if not all, of the characteristics of third world cities? How and why does urban planning work in the first world and not the third world when it can be argued that their cities are really not so different?

    ReplyDelete
  2. In your conclusion you say that building infrastructure in cities will increase the standard of living. However, if the people in the cities hold the majority of the wealth would improving infrastructure within the city widen the gap between economic classes or do you think it would provide more job opportunities? Would it improve the standard of living more if we invested in infrastructure in the poorer areas?

    ReplyDelete
  3. You say that building infrastructure is the way to increase the standard of living in these cities. How do you do this without a master plan that you described earlier? Isn't a master plan necessary to coordinate different infrastructure projects?

    ReplyDelete
  4. Good paper Sarah!
    I was at a panel talk last week where a professor in SIS was talking about her research that concentrated on time as an aspect of development: her research was that women in developing countries are loaded with so many tasks and with all these responsibilities could not manage their time most effectively, which hampered development. Do you think a similar principle applies to urban planning-- that there is so much to do in an expected short amount of time, and by the time it's actually done it just slows progress even more?

    Also, you bring in the idea of foreign aid in your last paragraph. Of course, the risk with foreign aid is that it creates a dependence: what ideas could be implemented to allow for foreign aid toward infrastructure without create a dangerous system of dependence?

    ReplyDelete
  5. The difference to me between Washington D.C. and a city in a developing country is that Washington D.C. provides a certain level of basic infrastructure throughout the city. The entire city is provided with electricity and running water, the vast majority of buildings in the city are up to code, all the streets in the city are maintained...sure, some areas are sketchy and definitely more run-down than others, but Washington D.C. doesn't have any shantytowns or outright slums. While the economic disparities in first world cities may be at the same ratio as the disparities in third world cities, the fact is that first world cities have a lot more wealth outright. We've all heard about "first world problems" - look, I'm not saying that first world cities don't have ghettos or that all first world cities are extremely economically productive. I'm saying that overall, conditions are better. The overall standard of living is higher.
    I don't have a perfect solution to creating a master plan for developing cities. I bring up the idea of foreign aid because right now, these developing cities barely have enough money to maintain existing infrastructure, let alone improve it. Like Caroline said, there's too much to do in too little time and with too little money. Infrastructure does help the economy - it allows people to move better within the city to get to work and it allows people to transport materials more easily (imagine driving a truck full of glass sheets over a dirt road rather than over a paved road). Infrastructure such as access to water is also invaluable. That's why we send foreign aid to build wells so that people don't have to travel for several hours a day to get water.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Great discussion, everyone. Here's a little more grist for the mill; if any stat were to be used to substantiate the POLICY importance having a serious discussion about our notions of what counts as 'development' and 'urban planning', this would probably be it.

    http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2011/10/26/worlds_fastest_growing_cities_

    ReplyDelete
  7. Sara,
    Great paper, it was a very interesting read and you made some good points. I was just wondering what your opinion was on the kind of infrastructure that would need to be built in order to develop such shantytowns. For example, the “projects,” or urban housing supported by the government in the United States designed to improve infrastructure, for the most part was a failure in terms of trying to reduce poverty and crime. From this example, infrastructure solely in terms of housing may not be the answer to improve living conditions for those in developing countries who live in corrugated tin shantytowns. Besides housing infrastructure, what could also help to alleviate some of the symptoms of poverty? Would it be better to try to stimulate job growth in such areas or build housing first?

    ReplyDelete