Sunday, October 23, 2011

Invisible Children and the LRA

Invisible Children and the Lord’s Resistance Army

When discussing the changes of war in class, one of the main points of discussion was the destruction of nuclear presence in countries across the world and a shift in the types of war that the world presently faces today. Although there is a large focus on newer types of more dangerous warfare, such as cyber warfare, there is little attention on the Lord’s Resistance Army’s use of children as soldiers. These children, skillfully manipulated by the LRA leader Joseph Cony to fight as his soldiers, have been hidden from communities across the globe. The existence of the Invisible Children, and the LRA, bring light to the similarities and differences of war today in comparison of that in the past.

After the decolonization of Africa, several failed presidencies destroyed the already unstable Uganda. Through corruption and violence, rebel groups formed across Uganda that worked to overthrow several presidents. “The indifference and failure of successive governments to create a unified nation contributed to northern Uganda’s instability, setting the stage for further rebellions and insurgencies” (Chatlani). One of these groups, the Lord’s Resistance Army (LRA) began spreading across Uganda, with a mission that “seeks to destabilize and overthrow the government of Uganda” (Terrorist). “Formed in 1992 in an attempt to unify a resistance movement fractured by the marginalization of the Uganda Democratic Christian Army, the group promotes a radical form of Christianity which it wants to make the foundation of a new Ugandan government” (Terrorist). “For the past 23 years, the Lord’s Resistance Army (LRA) and the Government of Uganda (GoU) have been waging a war that has left nearly two million innocent civilians caught in the middle” (Imvisible). Due to its lack of support by the Ugandan people, Joseph Cony, leader of the LRA, began attacking villages in Uganda that he feared conspired against him. “In 1996, as a response to the LRA attacks in the villages, the Ugandan government forcibly evicted thousands from their homes, relocating them into overcrowded camps in hopes of providing protection” (Invisible).

“Rape, torture, and murder have become the group's hallmarks in the almost fifteen years that they have terrorized the citizens of Northern Uganda” (Terrorist). Perhaps most astonishing atrocity is the LRA’s frequent kidnapping of Ugandan children to serve as child soldiers and sex slaves” (Chatlani). “Child abductees are immediately taught to fight, kill, and steal for the LRA, and are forced to participate in the abduction of other children” (Chatlani). Cony’s legacy is not for his success as an insurgent, but as a cruel individual that has instrumented the use of children to fight for him and his ideals.

The war in Uganda is similar to guerilla and civil wars of the past, yet it is quite different as well. Yes, there are guns, deaths and terror, but there are many hidden aspects to the destruction in Uganda. Although one would argue that this war boasts the same violence and corruption as that of the civil wars in Latin America, there is one key difference, the use of children. Perhaps children have been used in one way or another to contribute to wars in the past, but Cony has created a new aspect of this phenomenon. Not only are these children victims of rape by Cony’s soldiers, but they essentially make up the entire LRA. “Reports estimate that the LRA currently consists of approximately two hundred armed commanders and three thousand child soldiers” (Chatlani). This is definitely a new type of war that has only become publicized in the last decade. The ability to brainwash and manipulate these children, as well as their easy accessibility and abundance made it the ideal situation for Cony to create this new type of military, and is definitely a new type of warfare.

Refugees and children who have not yet been captured by Cony, “walk miles into town to sleep in verandas or shelters to escape LRA attacks” (Chatlani). Their label as ‘Invisible Children’ does absolute justice to the portray atrocities that Cony and the international community have done to these children. It is interesting that, in an age of technological advances, it took up until less than ten years ago for a few teenagers to inform the world of the violence that was being spread by Cony Why, in a time in which it is easiest to spread news about such horrific events, did it take so long for the injustices of Cony take so long to spark interest in the lives of the American people and countries across the world? Cony is brutally attacking the lives of countless children, who, as soon as they are abducted, have their childhood taken from them forever. Significantly.

Furthermore, terrorism is defined as “the use of violence and threats to intimidate or coerce, especially for political purposes” (Dictionary). In this case, along with the definitions that we discussed in class, Joseph Cony is clearly a terrorist. Cony’s lack of opposition has allowed him to continue his influence into other countries in South Africa. It is interesting that the U.S. and the UN have done little to stop someone that is most definitely a terrorist. The little action that they took in the past has allowed Cony’s terrorism to impact Ugandans

In a response to Cony’s actions, the UN has deployed peacekeepers across Uganda to help protect the thousands of child refugees. Despite the involvement of the UN, their success in Uganda and in helping to fight the war against war in Uganda should be brought into question. If the UN can’t even be used as a way to prevent wars that threaten countless individuals, especially children, how can they be noted as a way that the world is winning a war against war?

Moreover, the lack of response by outsiders shows stark contrast to the willingness of the American people to oppose the injustices of Hitler and the Nazis in WWII. Perhaps, people are now hesitant to directly involve themselves in current world issues because they do not want to face the consequences of the wars of the past. However, in the past few weeks, after years of pressure by the Invisible Children organization and other contributors, President Obama finally “authorized a small number of combat-equipped US forces to deploy to central Africa to provide assistance to regional forces that are working toward the removal of (LRA leader) Joseph Kony from the battlefield” (BBC). Perhaps this action will end the reign of Joseph Cony, but the affects of his regime will leave a mark on the lives of thousands of Ugandans for decades.

Works Cited

"BBC News - US to Send Troops to Uganda to Help Fight LRA Rebels." BBC - Homepage. Web. 21 Oct. 2011. .

Boustany, Nora. "Ugandan Rebel Reaches Out to International Court." The Washington Post: National, World & D.C. Area News and Headlines - The Washington Post. Web. 21 Oct. 2011. .

Chatlani, Hema. "Uganda: A Nation in Crisis." California Western. Web. 20 Oct. 2011. .

"Invisible Children - History of the Conflict." Invisible Children - Home. Web. 20 Oct. 2011. .

"Terrorist Organization Profile - START - National Consortium for the Study of Terrorism and Responses to Terrorism." Home - START - National Consortium for the Study of Terrorism and Responses to Terrorism. Web. 20 Oct. 2011. .

“Terrorismm” Web. 21 Oct. 2011. www.dictionary.com

7 comments:

  1. I would argue that rather than US ignoring the invisible children being a departure from previous actions (WWII), it shows consistency. Before and during most of World War II, the US did little to help Jews. During the thirties it actually tightened immigration laws, making it harder for jews to escape Germany for America. This continued through the war. As stories of concentration camps filtered out, many Americans refused to believe them, unable to face the atrocities. It was only until US soldiers atually reached concentration camps, at the very end of the war, that we moved to help the jewish populations. THis parallels the invisible children- it has taken years for the American public to become aware and only after a long time has the American government done anything to help out the populations that are suffering. THese are my thoughts anyway, do you have any comments?

    ReplyDelete
  2. I also found the point you made about how long it took for the public to became aware of this issue. It really shows how our communities function if it takes three kids with a video camera to show us an atrocious event which has been occurring for years but our media has yet to broadcast.
    Also you said if one of the main arguments war is decreasing is that we have a UN than this argument must be faulty because it has been unable to stop this war. Which I think is a valid point. In class when we were discussing whether war was decreasing or not we also mentioned that the types of war are changing and there is a lot of guerrilla warfare. Do you think this is significant in describing why the UN has been noneffective in ending this war? Maybe the type of war is more important then the actual numbers because these types of wars are harder to resolve. Maybe international organizations would be more effective at handling situations other than guerrilla warfare. Do you think there is another method which the UN could implement to become more effective in handling the LRA?

    ReplyDelete
  3. I think the LRA is a very interesting topic; good paper, Haili!
    I'm a bit unsure of your argument about the "willingness of outsiders to help." While there has not much outside assistance in terms of countries stepping in to countries like Uganda to prevent the destruction of Joseph Kony, there are still certainly plenty of individuals who advocate on behalf of citizens in Uganda--take the organization of Invisible Children as a whole. There are thousands of youth volunteers across the nation who travel to spread the stores of terror in Uganda and give information about what individuals can do to help.
    That being said, what do you think is the most effective method in dealing with the LRA? Is Obama's small scale troop surge the best answer, or should non profits like Invisible Children carry the burden of creating change? It sounds to me like the best explanation is a combination of multiple approaches and parties.

    Also, you spoke a lot about the fact that the American public was unaware of these atrocities for so long. Do you think that the coverage (in this case lack of) that the atrocities in Uganda received directly relates to the policy that comes to surround the issue?

    ReplyDelete
  4. Caroline, I agree with your comment that probably the way to eliminate the LRA would be a combination of government and nonprofit efforts. I think the U.S. government may hold slightly more of a responsibility than nonprofit organizations, though, because the U.S. has such tremendous influence and power in world affairs and would be able to put those to use to make a change. But it's true that the U.S. isn't the only one with influence in the world - are there other "outsiders", maybe some of the great powers such as the UK, France, and Germany, who should be doing more to help end these atrocities being committed in Uganda?

    ReplyDelete
  5. Jas, I think that the best thing the UN could do is increase awareness and help the children who have been affected or can still possible be affected. The LRA is now moving to other parts of Africa in which Invisible Children has started implementing new techniques to prevent kidnappings and other atrocities. Perhaps the UN should support Invisible Children in their efforts, as it is definitely costly and difficult to do as a corporation runnng in the U.S.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Caroline and Alnna, I agree with both of you. I absolutely think that they should work together. Invisible Children can't afford to carry all of the weight that the LRA has put upon Uganda. Also, IC doesn't have access or the ability to do certain things that the government can. I think it is crucial to get other countries involved as well in order to fix this crisis as soon as possible.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Sean, I honestly never thought of it that way. Maybe World War II wasn't a good example. However, there are definitely different issue such as clean water or hunger that are fixable but ignored. I'm not sure if that works.

    ReplyDelete